| Date/time (local) | Occurrence | Latitude | Longitude | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/12/15 05:19:32 | Detected | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | Strong downsweep in panel 11 followed by weaker, but classified downsweep in panel 15 was enough evidence to say "Detected" for SW. |
| 05/12/15 06:19:32 | Detected | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | Strong, classified downsweep in panel 1 with the addition of the possible faint, unclassified downsweep in panel 8 were enough evidence to say "Detected" for SW. |
| 05/12/15 06:34:32 | Possibly detected | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | |
| 05/12/15 07:19:32 | Detected | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | FOR MARK: Multiple unclassified but strong SW downsweeps, wondering if the Mahalanobis distance for these was just above 3.0? Definitely enough evidence here for me to say "Detected" for SW. |
| 05/12/15 07:34:32 | Detected | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | |
| 05/12/15 08:19:32 | Detected | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | |
| 05/12/15 09:19:32 | Detected | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | |
| 05/12/15 10:19:32 | Detected | 41.1418 | -70.9292 |
| Date/time (local) | Latitude | Longitude | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/12/15 05:19:32 | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | Strong downsweep in panel 11 followed by weaker, but classified downsweep in panel 15 was enough evidence to say "Detected" for SW. |
| 05/12/15 06:19:32 | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | Strong, classified downsweep in panel 1 with the addition of the possible faint, unclassified downsweep in panel 8 were enough evidence to say "Detected" for SW. |
| 05/12/15 07:19:32 | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | FOR MARK: Multiple unclassified but strong SW downsweeps, wondering if the Mahalanobis distance for these was just above 3.0? Definitely enough evidence here for me to say "Detected" for SW. |
| 05/12/15 18:19:32 | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | A lot of random FW pulses, no real pattern that is convincing. |