| Date/time (local) | Occurrence | Latitude | Longitude | Notes |
|---|
| 04/27/15 00:34:32 | Possibly detected | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | A few longer downsweeps that appear to be biological in panels 10 and 11, if
they were shorter I'd be more skeptical but this was enough to classify as
"Possibly" for HW. |
| 04/27/15 00:49:32 | Detected | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | |
| 04/27/15 01:19:32 | Possibly detected | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | Given the length of the two downsweeps in panel 3 and the pattern seen in the
previous two tracking periods I am comfortable with classifying this as
"Possibly" for HB. |
| 04/27/15 02:49:32 | Detected | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | Shorter, fainter downsweeps but there were enough in panels 12 and 13 to say
"Detected" for HB. |
| 04/27/15 03:19:32 | Detected | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | |
| 04/27/15 03:34:32 | Possibly detected | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | There are enough short, faint downsweeps in panels 13-15 that could be consistent
with HW song seen in past tracking periods to say at least "Possibly" for HW. |
| 04/27/15 03:49:32 | Detected | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | |
| 04/27/15 04:19:32 | Detected | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | |
| 04/27/15 04:34:32 | Detected | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | |
| 04/27/15 04:49:32 | Detected | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | |
| 04/27/15 05:34:32 | Possibly detected | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | The downsweeps in panels 10-12 have a lot of artifacts and not much pattern, but
judging by past tracking periods where HW are present I categorized this as at
least "Possibly". |
| 04/27/15 05:49:32 | Possibly detected | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | Faint, shallow downsweeps in panels 14-16 are indicative of HW although they are
spaced farther apart and there is less of an apparent pattern. The three PTs in
panels 15 and 16 are especially "shapely" so I am classifying this as "Possibly"
for HW. |
| Date/time (local) | Latitude | Longitude | Notes |
|---|
| 04/27/15 00:34:32 | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | A few longer downsweeps that appear to be biological in panels 10 and 11, if
they were shorter I'd be more skeptical but this was enough to classify as
"Possibly" for HW. |
| 04/27/15 01:19:32 | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | Given the length of the two downsweeps in panel 3 and the pattern seen in the
previous two tracking periods I am comfortable with classifying this as
"Possibly" for HB. |
| 04/27/15 02:49:32 | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | Shorter, fainter downsweeps but there were enough in panels 12 and 13 to say
"Detected" for HB. |
| 04/27/15 03:34:32 | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | There are enough short, faint downsweeps in panels 13-15 that could be consistent
with HW song seen in past tracking periods to say at least "Possibly" for HW. |
| 04/27/15 05:34:32 | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | The downsweeps in panels 10-12 have a lot of artifacts and not much pattern, but
judging by past tracking periods where HW are present I categorized this as at
least "Possibly". |
| 04/27/15 05:49:32 | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | Faint, shallow downsweeps in panels 14-16 are indicative of HW although they are
spaced farther apart and there is less of an apparent pattern. The three PTs in
panels 15 and 16 are especially "shapely" so I am classifying this as "Possibly"
for HW. |
| 04/27/15 09:34:32 | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | Many classified FW pulses but very inconsistent IPI/amps, so there is strong
evidence that a recurring 20 Hz noise is creating spurious PTs that are being
classified by mistake. |
| 04/27/15 11:34:32 | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | FOR MARK: Possible SW here? There's a possible doublet in panel 1, and three
possible singlets following it but no classified calls. Followed our latest
protocol and stuck with "Not Detected" but these downsweeps are not
characteristic of the random low freq noise we've been picking up so they
stuck out to me. |
| 04/27/15 14:19:32 | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | Very short, faint downsweeps recurring in panels 1, 3, 6, and 12 but not enough evidence to
suggest presence of animal. |
| 04/27/15 16:19:32 | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | Faint downsweeps in panel 13 but they are unclassified and one looks like it's been chopped
up. |
| 04/27/15 16:34:32 | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | A faint but nice looking downsweep in panel 4, SW in the distance? This one is also chopped
up. |
| 04/27/15 17:19:32 | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | I think the faint downsweeps in the previous tracking periods have been SWs but they were
too far off to be classified. This one has a doublet in panel 16 with a correctly classified
downsweep (the other is misclassified as a HW, as well as another singlet in panel 2). |
| 04/27/15 18:19:32 | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | FOR MARK: Two downsweeps in panel 10 that look like SW misclassified as HW. There's
another nice unclassified downsweep at the beginning of panel 14 that is possible SW. There
are two longer, higher amp PTs in panels 13 and 14 that are not SW-like but seem biological.
Not sure what to do with this period, there's enough ambiguity that I didn't feel confident
saying "Possibly" for any species. |