| Date/time (local) | Latitude | Longitude | Notes |
|---|
| 04/22/15 06:19:32 | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | Some high freq "moan-like" PTs, but accompanied by a lot of artifacts and low
amp/high freq noise. Since there is no discernible pattern, no HB downsweeps,
and the tonals are occurring at various frequencies I'm convinced it's not
biological. |
| 04/22/15 11:19:32 | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | Many repeated downsweeps in panels 5-8, not as steep or high freq as some of
the HW song we've seen before and there are what look like harmonics for some
of them. But I can't think of what else would make this kind of patterned
downsweep besides HW. |
| 04/22/15 12:19:32 | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | Some short downsweeps in panels 3 and 4 but similar to cases we looked at
during our meeting where there is not enough evidence (i.e. long, patterned
downsweeps) to suggest HW presence. |
| 04/22/15 14:19:32 | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | Strong pattern of high amp pulses with 15s IPI. Panel 3 has four pulses with
consistent IPIs in a train, panels 4 and 5 have three pulses with same IPI/amp in
train, and panels 8, 9, and 10 have same pattern (although first classified pulse
in panel 10 has an inconsistent IPI with the following pulse). Enough
classified, with consistent IPI/amp to justify "Detected". |
| 04/22/15 16:19:32 | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | FOR MARK: This was a frustrating one but I'm sticking with "Not Detected" for FW.
There is a possible strong pulse train in panels 1 and 2 with two classified, but
the classified pulse in panel 2 has an IPI of 17s rather than the previous 15s so
there aren't enough classified within a train with consistent IPIs for me to say
"Detected". Panels 8-11 have many classified pulses but there are inconsistent
IPI/amps throughout the train. I'm very suspicious of spurious 20Hz noises that
may be getting classified as fins. |
| 04/22/15 17:19:32 | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | One classified SW singlet in panel 6. |
| 04/22/15 20:19:32 | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | Two classified RW upcalls, with one possible unclassified upcall in panel 5. |
| 04/22/15 21:19:32 | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | FOR MARK: Technically, the protocol states that 3+ RW upcalls must be present to
classify as "Detected". I'm tempted to say they are because of the strength and shape
of the two classified calls, but because there are not "3+" upcalls here I'm stuck with
"Possibly". Is this a case where I can use my judgment and stray from the protocol? |
| 04/22/15 22:19:32 | 41.1418 | -70.9292 | One faint, classified upcall in panel 5. |