| Date/time (local) | Occurrence | Latitude | Longitude | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/29/15 16:29:33 | Possibly detected | 41.4987 | -69.4530 | It looks like a possible SW doublet with the first downsweep classified but the higher freq noise that is connected to the second downsweep makes it questionable. |
| Date/time (local) | Occurrence | Latitude | Longitude | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/29/15 09:29:33 | Possibly detected | 41.5641 | -69.4532 |
| Date/time (local) | Occurrence | Latitude | Longitude | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/29/15 06:29:33 | Possibly detected | 41.5300 | -69.4355 | |
| 06/29/15 07:29:33 | Possibly detected | 41.5342 | -69.4430 |
| Date/time (local) | Latitude | Longitude | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/29/15 08:29:33 | 41.5556 | -69.4481 | Some possible HW PTs in panel 14 but not enough evidence for species presence. |
| 06/29/15 15:44:33 | 41.5019 | -69.4524 | A somewhat convincing upcall in panel 9 but it looks like it's two higher amp sections that the PT pieced together. |
| 06/29/15 16:29:33 | 41.4987 | -69.4530 | It looks like a possible SW doublet with the first downsweep classified but the higher freq noise that is connected to the second downsweep makes it questionable. |