| Date/time (local) | Occurrence | Latitude | Longitude | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/13/15 05:29:33 | Detected | 41.5871 | -69.2562 | Four classified FW pulses in panels 1 and 2 with consistent IPIs of 15-16s. Saying "Detected" for SW because there is one classified within a triplet followed by a clear unclassified downsweep at the end of panel 9. |
| 05/13/15 05:44:33 | Detected | 41.5871 | -69.2594 | |
| 05/13/15 06:29:33 | Detected | 41.5918 | -69.2668 | Saying "Detected" for SW due to three clear downsweeps in panel 10, although they're all singlets and only one is classified. Said "Possibly" for RW but not convinced by the RW upcall in panel 3 due to PT directly above it. |
| 05/13/15 06:44:33 | Detected | 41.5918 | -69.2698 | Three FW pulses in panel 6 have consistent 15s IPIs. |
| 05/13/15 07:29:33 | Detected | 41.5925 | -69.2765 | |
| 05/13/15 09:29:33 | Detected | 41.5810 | -69.2892 | Lots of FW pulses but no cases where there are three in a row in pattern. |
| 05/13/15 12:29:33 | Detected | 41.5482 | -69.3002 | |
| 05/13/15 13:16:46 | Possibly detected | 41.5500 | -69.3093 | |
| 05/13/15 15:28:06 | Detected | 41.5477 | -69.3236 | |
| 05/13/15 17:29:33 | Possibly detected | 41.5729 | -69.3513 | Tons of RW upcalls! These are much more convincing than the calls in the last tracking period. They are a little suspicious considering the presence of HW, and since the upcalls are occurring at such a high rate, but most of the calls are isolated from any other signs of HW (i.e. high frequency song components) so I trust these are true RW upcalls. Possible SW doublet in panel 2. |
| Date/time (local) | Occurrence | Latitude | Longitude | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/13/15 02:29:33 | Possibly detected | 41.5518 | -69.2142 | Second classified FW pulse in panel 1 and the two classified FW pulses in panel 2 all have IPIs of ~16s, enough to say "Possibly". |
| 05/13/15 05:29:33 | Detected | 41.5871 | -69.2562 | Four classified FW pulses in panels 1 and 2 with consistent IPIs of 15-16s. Saying "Detected" for SW because there is one classified within a triplet followed by a clear unclassified downsweep at the end of panel 9. |
| 05/13/15 06:44:33 | Possibly detected | 41.5918 | -69.2698 | Three FW pulses in panel 6 have consistent 15s IPIs. |
| 05/13/15 07:29:33 | Detected | 41.5925 | -69.2765 | |
| 05/13/15 08:27:25 | Possibly detected | 41.5847 | -69.2815 | Three FW pulses in panel 12 are classified but IPIs are slightly off and pulses are faint. |
| 05/13/15 15:28:06 | Detected | 41.5477 | -69.3236 | |
| 05/13/15 16:29:33 | Possibly detected | 41.5530 | -69.3350 | There are a lot of spurious PTs in this tracking period, so I don't think that the three classified RW upcalls are true classifications judging by their short, low amp PTs that don't have very good shape (aside from the one at the beginning of panel 5 that has a more believable shape). I am staying with "Not Detected" for RW because I am not convinced by these PTs that there is any possible biological presence here. |
| 05/13/15 18:44:33 | Detected | 41.5845 | -69.3663 | |
| 05/13/15 19:29:33 | Possibly detected | 41.5848 | -69.3755 | |
| 05/13/15 20:29:33 | Possibly detected | 41.5852 | -69.3877 | |
| 05/13/15 20:33:25 | Possibly detected | 41.5852 | -69.3877 | |
| 05/13/15 23:29:33 | Possibly detected | 41.5339 | -69.3898 |
| Date/time (local) | Occurrence | Latitude | Longitude | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/13/15 00:29:33 | Possibly detected | 41.5647 | -69.2016 | Possible RW upcall in panel 3 that's very faint but isolated from HW and is long with nice shape. |
| 05/13/15 06:29:33 | Possibly detected | 41.5918 | -69.2668 | Saying "Detected" for SW due to three clear downsweeps in panel 10, although they're all singlets and only one is classified. Said "Possibly" for RW but not convinced by the RW upcall in panel 3 due to PT directly above it. |
| 05/13/15 17:29:33 | Detected | 41.5729 | -69.3513 | Tons of RW upcalls! These are much more convincing than the calls in the last tracking period. They are a little suspicious considering the presence of HW, and since the upcalls are occurring at such a high rate, but most of the calls are isolated from any other signs of HW (i.e. high frequency song components) so I trust these are true RW upcalls. Possible SW doublet in panel 2. |
| Date/time (local) | Occurrence | Latitude | Longitude | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/13/15 00:29:33 | Detected | 41.5647 | -69.2016 | Possible RW upcall in panel 3 that's very faint but isolated from HW and is long with nice shape. |
| 05/13/15 01:29:33 | Possibly detected | 41.5502 | -69.2025 | Possible HW pattern in panels 15 and 16. |
| 05/13/15 01:44:33 | Detected | 41.5506 | -69.2056 | |
| 05/13/15 02:29:33 | Detected | 41.5518 | -69.2142 | Second classified FW pulse in panel 1 and the two classified FW pulses in panel 2 all have IPIs of ~16s, enough to say "Possibly". |
| 05/13/15 04:29:33 | Possibly detected | 41.5661 | -69.2398 | Some faint possible HW song in panels 10 and 13. |
| 05/13/15 10:29:33 | Detected | 41.5816 | -69.3015 | |
| 05/13/15 17:29:33 | Detected | 41.5729 | -69.3513 | Tons of RW upcalls! These are much more convincing than the calls in the last tracking period. They are a little suspicious considering the presence of HW, and since the upcalls are occurring at such a high rate, but most of the calls are isolated from any other signs of HW (i.e. high frequency song components) so I trust these are true RW upcalls. Possible SW doublet in panel 2. |
| 05/13/15 23:29:33 | Detected | 41.5339 | -69.3898 |
| Date/time (local) | Latitude | Longitude | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/13/15 00:29:33 | 41.5647 | -69.2016 | Possible RW upcall in panel 3 that's very faint but isolated from HW and is long with nice shape. |
| 05/13/15 01:29:33 | 41.5502 | -69.2025 | Possible HW pattern in panels 15 and 16. |
| 05/13/15 02:29:33 | 41.5518 | -69.2142 | Second classified FW pulse in panel 1 and the two classified FW pulses in panel 2 all have IPIs of ~16s, enough to say "Possibly". |
| 05/13/15 04:29:33 | 41.5661 | -69.2398 | Some faint possible HW song in panels 10 and 13. |
| 05/13/15 05:29:33 | 41.5871 | -69.2562 | Four classified FW pulses in panels 1 and 2 with consistent IPIs of 15-16s. Saying "Detected" for SW because there is one classified within a triplet followed by a clear unclassified downsweep at the end of panel 9. |
| 05/13/15 06:29:33 | 41.5918 | -69.2668 | Saying "Detected" for SW due to three clear downsweeps in panel 10, although they're all singlets and only one is classified. Said "Possibly" for RW but not convinced by the RW upcall in panel 3 due to PT directly above it. |
| 05/13/15 06:44:33 | 41.5918 | -69.2698 | Three FW pulses in panel 6 have consistent 15s IPIs. |
| 05/13/15 08:27:25 | 41.5847 | -69.2815 | Three FW pulses in panel 12 are classified but IPIs are slightly off and pulses are faint. |
| 05/13/15 09:29:33 | 41.5810 | -69.2892 | Lots of FW pulses but no cases where there are three in a row in pattern. |
| 05/13/15 16:29:33 | 41.5530 | -69.3350 | There are a lot of spurious PTs in this tracking period, so I don't think that the three classified RW upcalls are true classifications judging by their short, low amp PTs that don't have very good shape (aside from the one at the beginning of panel 5 that has a more believable shape). I am staying with "Not Detected" for RW because I am not convinced by these PTs that there is any possible biological presence here. |
| 05/13/15 17:29:33 | 41.5729 | -69.3513 | Tons of RW upcalls! These are much more convincing than the calls in the last tracking period. They are a little suspicious considering the presence of HW, and since the upcalls are occurring at such a high rate, but most of the calls are isolated from any other signs of HW (i.e. high frequency song components) so I trust these are true RW upcalls. Possible SW doublet in panel 2. |
| 05/13/15 18:59:33 | 41.5846 | -69.3693 | Lots of classified FW pulses but they are jumbled and low amp, not convincing. |